Brief: Adverse Childhood Experiences and Trauma

Updated: Sep 10, 2020

70% of adults in the U.S. have experienced at least one form of traumatic event in their lives.


Traumatic childhood experiences have a significant impact on individuals and the consequences can affect entire communities, making it a serious public health issue. Trauma is defined as a person’s response to one or multiple events that are physically or emotionally harmful or threatening.(2) Many events that cause trauma include natural disasters, childhood abuse or neglect, sexual assault, and other forms of violence, which can have a lasting effect on behavior and health.(3) If left unaddressed, these traumatic experiences can increase the likelihood of individuals developing mental illnesses, substance use disorders, and other mental and physical health conditions that affect the overall quality of life.(4)


This fact sheet, developed by Addiction Policy Forum and the National District Attorneys Association, discusses the impact of childhood trauma and subsequent health and social consequences, strategies to prevent trauma, and innovative approaches to support children and young adults with high number of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) across the country.


What Are ACEs


Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) is the term used to describe potentially traumatic events experienced by persons under 18.(5) They can be categorized into three types:(6)

  • Childhood abuse – physical, emotional, or sexual abuse;

  • Neglect – physical or emotional neglect; and

  • Household challenges – mental illness, parental separation or divorce, and parental violence or substance misuse.


When children are exposed to stressful events, brain development can be impacted. These altered brain developments can cause unhealthy coping mechanisms.(7) The higher the number of ACEs results in a higher risk for long-term negative outcomes such as depression, heart disease, liver disease, trouble at school and work, financial stress and substance misuse and addiction.(8)




What Can Be Done


  • While many states have implemented ACEs screening, research recommends pairing screening with intensive intervention and focusing on prevention.

  • According to Harvard University’s Center on the Developing Child, “The ideal approach to ACEs is one that prevents the need for all levels of services: by reducing the sources of stress in people’s lives, whether basic needs like food, housing, and diapers, or more entrenched sources of stress, like substance abuse, mental illness, violent relationships, community crime, discrimination, or poverty.”(9)

  • Primary prevention to stop ACEs from happening can include:(10) Home visits for families with newborns; Parenting training programs; family wellness; and Child welfare and criminal justice early interventions.

  • Policymakers and practitioners in many different sectors can improve outcomes for children and families by implementing interventions built on the science of child development. 

  • In Three Principles to Improve Outcomes for Children and Families, Harvard researchers recommend three areas for those with ACEs scores(:11) Support responsive relationships for children and adults; Strengthen core life skills; and Reduce sources of stress in the lives of children and families.

  • Trauma should not go unaddressed, and trauma-informed care promotes positive health outcomes. The core values of trauma-informed care include safety, transparency, trustworthiness and dignity.(12)

  • Trauma-informed care means treating a whole person, taking into account past and present experiences, and service delivery mechanisms when attempting to understand behaviors and treat the patient.(13)

  • Prevention begins with protective factors in a youth’s life. The Child Welfare Information Gateway defines protective factors as “conditions or attributes of individuals, families, communities, or the larger society that mitigate risk and promote healthy development and wellbeing. Put simply, they are the strengths that help to buffer and support families at risk.”14


Download Fact Sheet



Case Studies


Several states and local jurisdictions are improving services to support children, families, and young adults with high ACEs scores, including:


ALASKA

Pediatrician Training: Through community organizations and collaborative group efforts, Alaska has increased awareness and prevention of ACEs through pediatric training, resource development, and programs to improve healthcare services for children and families.  www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/ACE-Case-Study.pdf


MASSACHUSETTS

Breed All Stars Program: The Breed All Stars Program, located in Lynn, Massachusetts, is a leadership program designed for at-risk children that teaches students about substance misuse and prevention, while creating a positive rapport with adults. www.addictionpolicy.org/blog/making-everyday-kids-all-stars 


WASHINGTON

Expansion of Work Opportunities: Families receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) can participate in Head Start programs, such as parenting education, home visiting, and volunteer in a child’s school or care setting, as part of the work requirements. Increased Support in Juvenile Courts: Juvenile offenders with high prevalence of ACEs can be prioritized into programs to prevent future adverse outcomes.Trauma-Informed Schools Initiative: Training, guidance, referral, and technical assistance are provided to schools to adopt a Compassionate Schools Infrastructure. Using a traumainformed approach, Compassionate Schools have improved outcomes for children impacted by trauma, while strengthening families and preventing child maltreatment.    www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/acestudy/pdf/ACE_Case_Study_Washington.pdf


WISCONSIN

Children of Incarcerated Parents: To support children growing up with an incarcerated parent(s), Wisconsin is developing services to help reduce exposure to additional ACEs for children with a parent(s) who is incarcerated and for individuals who have a history of trauma. www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/acestudy/pdf/ACE_Case_Study_Wisconsin.pdf